Cardoza et al v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc. et al

Filing 102

ORDER that parties submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 14 days of the resolution of 38 Motion for Conditional Certification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
BROOKE CARDOZA, et al.,
10
Plaintiff(s),
11
vs.
12
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC., et al.,
13
Defendant(s).
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:13-cv-1820-JAD-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 90)

15

Pending before the Court is the parties’ disputed discovery plan. Docket No. 90. The Court held

16

a hearing on the parties’ conflicting positions. See Docket No. 97. The Court has also received

17

supplemental briefing from the parties. Docket Nos. 98-100. Having reviewed the arguments and in

18

light of the procedural posture of this particular case, the Court finds that the goals outlined in Rule 1

19

for the “just, speedy, and inexpensive” resolution of this case are best served by ordering discovery to

20

begin after resolution of the motion to dismiss and the motion for conditional certification. Accordingly,

21

the Court ORDERS the parties to submit a proposed discovery plan within 14 days of the resolution of

22

the motion for conditional certification. In the interim, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs that discovery

23

should not be conducted with the limited exception that the parties shall exchange initial disclosures as

24

already ordered.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

DATED: April 18, 2014

27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge