Cardoza et al v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc. et al

Filing 372

ORDER Granting 371 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 357 Amended Complaint. Bloomin' Brands, Inc. answer due 10/9/2015. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/6/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:13-cv-01820-JAD-NJK Document 371 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 3

1

7

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS JR., SBN 132099 (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
CATHERINE A. CONWAY, SBN 98366 (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285 (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520

8

(additional counsel on signature page)

9

Attorneys for Defendants

2
3
4
5
6

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12
13

BROOKE CARDOZA, Individually and On
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.,

14
15
16
17

Plaintiffs,
v.
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC., et al.,

CASE NO. 2:13-cv-01820-JAD-(NJK)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED
COLLECTIVE / CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 357)

Defendants.
(FIRST REQUEST)

18
19

Action Filed: October 4, 2013

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

WHEREAS, on September 15, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Collective / Class
Action Complaint (“Third Amended Complaint,” ECF No. 357);
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Rules 15(a)(3) and 6(d), Defendants were required to respond to the
Third Amended Complaint by October 2, 2015;
WHEREAS, Defendants mistakenly understood that their response deadline was October 9,
2015, to file a response under Rules 12 and 6(d);

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
THIRD AMENDED COLLECTIVE / CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01820-JAD-(NJK)

Case 2:13-cv-01820-JAD-NJK Document 371 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

WHEREAS, Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1 permit Plaintiffs and Defendants to stipulate to
extend the time to respond to the Third Amended Complaint; and,
WHEREAS, the stipulated extension of time is not made for purposes of delay and will not
affect other deadlines set forth in this Court’s scheduling orders (ECF Nos. 176, 330).
THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants, through the undersigned counsel of record, stipulate
and agree that shall file a response to the Third Amended Complaint by October 9, 2015.

7
8
9

Dated: October 6, 2015

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By: /s/ Jesse A. Cripps

10

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esq.
Catherine A. Conway, Esq.
Jesse A. Cripps, Esq.
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197

11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants Bloomin’ Brands,
Inc.; OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC;
Outback Steakhouse of Florida, LLC; OS
Restaurant Services, LLC

14
15
16
17

Dated: October 6, 2015

18

WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO,
SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP
By: /s/ Justin C. Jones

21

Don Springmeyer, Esq.
Justin C. Jones, Esq.
Bradley Schrager, Esq.
3556 E. Russell Road, Second Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89120

22

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

19
20

23
24
25
26
27

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _______________
October 6, 2015.

________________________________________
______________________
__ _
_
_ _
UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT JUDGE
NITED STATES D R
T
T
DISTRICT

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
THIRD AMENDED COLLECTIVE / CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01820-JAD-(NJK)