Desert Sun Enterprises Limited v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 357 et al

Filing 47

ORDER Granting 46 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to 43 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/10/2014. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/30/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Case 2:13-cv-01885-MMD-NJK Document 46 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6

THE URBAN LAW FIRM
MICHAEL A. URBAN, Nevada State Bar No. 3875
NATHAN R. RING, Nevada State Bar No. 12078
4270 S. Decatur Blvd., Suite A-9
Las Vegas, NV 89103
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Electronic Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant, International Brotherhood
of Electrical Workers, Local Union 357

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10
11

DESERT SUN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
d/b/a CONVENTION TECHNICAL
SERVICES,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
vs.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION
357, et al.

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO: 2:13-cv-01885-MMD-NJK

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[First Request]

19
20
21
22
23
24

Defendant, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 357 (“Local
357”), by and through its counsel of record, the Urban Law Firm, and Plaintiff, Desert Sun Enterprises
Limited d/b/a Convention Technical Services, by and through its counsel of record, Lionel, Sawyer &
Collins, hereby stipulate and request the deadline for Defendant’s response to the Plaintiffs Motion for
Summary Judgment is extended from June 30, 2014, to July 10, 2014.

25

This request and stipulation is made for good cause and is not made with any intent to delay

26

these proceedings. The purpose of requesting the extension of time to respond to the Motion for

27

Summary Judgment is the parties completed a meet and confer on June 26, 2014, and they have resolved

28

remaining discovery disputes but Defendant needs additional time to respond.
1

Case 2:13-cv-01885-MMD-NJK Document 46 Filed 06/30/14 Page 2 of 2

1

An extension of the time to respond will allow the parties to complete resolution of the discovery

2

dispute. For these reasons, the parties, through their respective counsels, submit there is good cause for

3

extending the response deadline to the Motion for Summary Judgment in this matter and request the

4

Court grant the stipulation to extend the Defendant’s response deadline from June 30, 2014, to July 10,

5

2014.

6
7

Dated: June 30, 2014

LIONEL SAWYER & COLLINS

8
/s/ Amy L. Baker
Gregory E. Smith, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 1590
Amy L. Baker, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11907
Attorneys for Plaintiff

9
10
11
12
13

Dated: June 30, 2014.

THE URBAN LAW FIRM

14
/s/ Nathan R. Ring
Nathan R. Ring, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 12078
Counsel for Defendant, Local 357

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED:
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
June 30, 2014

Dated: ___________________________

23
24
25
26
27
28
2

_____