United States et al v. Jaynes Corporation et al

Filing 12

ORDER Denying 9 Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to File a Response to 1 Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
UNITED STATES, et al.,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
JAYNES CORPORATION, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:13-cv-1907-APG-NJK
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND
(Docket No. 9)

Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend the deadline to file a response to the

17

complaint. Docket No. 9. Stipulations to extend Court deadlines are not effective absent Court

18

approval. See Local Rule 7-1(b). A showing of “good cause” is required for requests to extend

19

deadlines. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). The pending stipulation provides no reason whatsoever for

20

the extension requested. Accordingly, it is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

DATED: November 27, 2013

23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge