United States et al v. Jaynes Corporation et al
Filing
151
ORDER re 136 Order. Publicly Filed Documents due by 6/14/2016. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
5
UNITED STATES for the use and benefit
of AGATE STEEL, INC. and AGATE
STEEL, INC.,
ORDER
6
7
8
9
Case No. 2:13-CV-01907-APG-NJK
Plaintiffs,
(ECF No. 91)
v.
JAYNES CORPORATION and WESTERN
SURETY COMPANY,
10
Defendants.
___________________________________
11
AND ALL RELATED CLAIMS.
12
13
In light of Magistrate Judge Koppe’s order (ECF No. 136) unsealing various exhibits
14
submitted in relation to summary judgment briefing, the parties are directed to meet and confer
15
regarding whether plaintiff Agate Steel, Inc.’s in camera submission (see ECF No. 91) should be
16
filed on the publicly-accessible docket and whether the exhibits to the third party defendants’
17
motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 118) should be unsealed.
18
If the parties agree that these documents should be available on the public docket with no
19
redactions, then the party who submitted the document must file it in publicly accessible form on
20
or before June 14, 2016. If the parties do not agree, then any party who objects to some or all of
21
the filings being made publicly accessible, in whole or in part, must file a motion to seal
22
explaining why the filings should be sealed or redacted. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of
23
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006).
24
DATED this 7th day of June, 2016.
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?