United States et al v. Jaynes Corporation et al

Filing 151

ORDER re 136 Order. Publicly Filed Documents due by 6/14/2016. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 UNITED STATES for the use and benefit of AGATE STEEL, INC. and AGATE STEEL, INC., ORDER 6 7 8 9 Case No. 2:13-CV-01907-APG-NJK Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 91) v. JAYNES CORPORATION and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, 10 Defendants. ___________________________________ 11 AND ALL RELATED CLAIMS. 12 13 In light of Magistrate Judge Koppe’s order (ECF No. 136) unsealing various exhibits 14 submitted in relation to summary judgment briefing, the parties are directed to meet and confer 15 regarding whether plaintiff Agate Steel, Inc.’s in camera submission (see ECF No. 91) should be 16 filed on the publicly-accessible docket and whether the exhibits to the third party defendants’ 17 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 118) should be unsealed. 18 If the parties agree that these documents should be available on the public docket with no 19 redactions, then the party who submitted the document must file it in publicly accessible form on 20 or before June 14, 2016. If the parties do not agree, then any party who objects to some or all of 21 the filings being made publicly accessible, in whole or in part, must file a motion to seal 22 explaining why the filings should be sealed or redacted. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of 23 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). 24 DATED this 7th day of June, 2016. 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?