Piovo v. Stone et al
Filing
133
ORDER Denying 108 Motion to Quash Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/3/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
JOSEPH EUGENE PIOVO, Individually and as
Beneficiary of Vice Roy United Nations Credit
and Commerce International Blind Trust,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ROBERT STONE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-01922-APG-GWF
ORDER
Motion to Quash (#108)
14
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Ronald A. Colquitt’s Motion to Quash
15
Service and to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 4(m) and FRCP 12(b)(5) (#108) filed on
16
September 2, 2014.
17
DISCUSSION
18
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that,
19
[i]f a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is
filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or
order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff
shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for
service for an appropriate period.
20
21
22
23
FRCP 4(m).
24
Defendant Colquitt was first named in the Amended First Complaint (#60), filed on March
25
28, 2014. The First Amended Complaint was stricken on April 10, 2014 because it was filed
26
without leave of the court. The Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (#74) on May 27,
27
...
28
1
2014. This started the service period as to Defendant Colquitt. Defendant Colquitt was served on
2
August 7, 2014, before the service period expired. Accordingly,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’s Motion to Quash Service (#108) is denied.
4
DATED this 3rd day of October, 2014.
5
6
7
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?