Brandon v. Majestic Behavioral Health

Filing 18

ORDER that 16 Motion to Request 30 Day Extension for Medical Emergency is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that 17 Motion to Ask if Defendants are Arguing Proof of service is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

HENRY BRANDON,

8
Plaintiff(s),
9
vs.
10
MAJESTIC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH,
11
12

Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:13-cv-01969-RCJ-NJK

ORDER

13
14

Before the Court is Plaintiff Henry Brandon’s Motion to Request 30 Day Extension for

15

Medical Emergency (Docket No. 16), and Motion to Ask if Defendants are Arguing Proof of

16

Service (Docket No. 17).

17

Plaintiff’s Motion to Request 30 Day Extension for Medical Emergency (Docket No. 16)

18

seeks a 30 day extension for a medical emergency; however, Plaintiff does not indicate which

19

deadline he seeks to extend. Thus, the Court cannot determine whether an extension is

20

appropriate. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Request 30 Day Extension for Medical

21

Emergency (Docket No. 16) is denied without prejudice.

22

Plaintiff’s Motion to Ask if Defendants are Arguing Proof of Service (Docket No. 17)

23

appears to be a discovery-based motion. Plaintiff requests a copy of at least one telephone

24

conversation. Discovery, however, has not yet commenced in this action and, therefore, Plaintiff

25

has not made a proper discovery request. Additionally, Plaintiff failed to provide any points or

26

authorities. Under LR 7-2, “[t]he failure of a moving party to file points and authorities in

27

support of the motion shall constitute a consent to the denial of the motion.” Accordingly,

28

Plaintiff’s Motion to Ask if Defendants are Arguing Proof of Service (Docket No. 17) is denied.

1

CONCLUSION

2

Based on the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore,

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Request 30 Day Extension for

4
5
6
7

Medical Emergency (Docket No. 16) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Ask if Defendants are Arguing
Proof of Service (Docket No. 17) is DENIED.
DATED this

26th

day of December, 2013.

8
9
10
11

NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-