Brass v. Williams et al
Filing
15
ORDER that the petitioner shall have 60 days from the date of entry of this order, to FILE AND SERVE an amended petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 30 days after the service of amended petition to file answer. If amended pe tition not filed, respondents shall have 30 days from the date on which amended petition is due, within which to file answer to original petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if and when respondents file an answer, petitioner shall have 30 days after service of answer to file and serve reply. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/12/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2
3
4
GEORGE M. BRASS,
5
Petitioner,
Case No. 2:13-cv-02020-GMN-VCF
6
vs.
ORDER
7
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., et al.,
8
Respondents.
9
10
11
This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a Nevada state prisoner, pursuant
12
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 1, 2014, the Court entered an order granting petitioner’s motion for
13
the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 13). On May 2, 2014, the Federal Public Defender’s Office
14
filed a notice indicating their inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings due to a conflict
15
of interest. CJA panel counsel Angela H. Dows has indicated her ability to represent petitioner.
16
Therefore, Angela H. Dows is appointed to represent petitioner in these habeas corpus proceedings.
17
Counsel will represent petitioner in all future federal proceedings relating to this matter (including
18
subsequent actions) and appeals therefrom, unless allowed to withdraw. The Court now sets a
19
schedule for further proceedings in this action.
20
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that counsel for petitioner shall meet with petitioner as
21
soon as reasonably possible, if counsel has not already done so, to: (a) review the procedures
22
applicable in cases under 28 U.S.C. § 2254; (b) discuss and explore with petitioner, as fully as
23
possible, the potential grounds for habeas corpus relief in petitioner’s case; and (c) advise petitioner
24
that all possible grounds for habeas corpus relief must be raised at this time in this action and that
25
the failure to do so will likely result in any omitted grounds being barred from future review.
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have sixty (60) days from the date of
27
entry of this order, to FILE AND SERVE on respondents an amended petition for writ of habeas
28
corpus, which shall include all known grounds for relief (both exhausted and unexhausted).
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have thirty (30) days after service of
2
an amended petition within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended petition. If
3
petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have thirty (30) days from the date
4
on which the amended petition is due within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, petitioner’s
5
original petition.
6
7
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if and when respondents file an answer, petitioner shall
have thirty (30) days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by the parties herein
shall be filed with an index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The CM/ECF
10
attachments that are filed shall further be identified by the number or numbers (or letter or letters) of
11
the exhibits in the attachment.
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties SHALL SEND courtesy (paper) copies of all
13
exhibits presented in support of the amended petition and the response to the amended petition to
14
the Reno Division of this Court. Courtesy copies shall be mailed to the Clerk of Court, 400 S.
15
Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501, and directed to the attention of “Staff Attorney” on the outside of the
16
mailing address label.
17
DATED this 12th day of May, 2014.
18
19
20
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?