Brass v. Williams et al

Filing 96

ORDER Granting 94 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner shall have to and including 11/5/2018, to file his reply to respondents' answer to his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in this case. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the petitioner at his last institutional address of record. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 GEORGE BRASS, 6 7 8 Case No. 2:13-cv-02020-GMN-VCF Petitioner, v. ORDER BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents. 9 10 Petitioner has filed a letter with the Court seeking a ten-day extension of time to file his 11 reply and appointment of new counsel. (ECF Nos. 93 & 94). Petitioner’s counsel has responded, 12 indicating that he believes petitioner’s dissatisfaction with counsel stems from an apparent 13 misunderstanding. (ECF No. 95). Counsel indicates that a ten-day extension of time is appropriate 14 so that he and petitioner can meet and attempt to resolve the misunderstanding; counsel further 15 indicates that respondents have no opposition to an extension of time. (Id.) 16 Good cause appearing, petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file his reply (ECF 17 No. 94) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have to and including November 5, 2018, to file his reply 18 to respondents’ answer to his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in this case. 19 It is further ordered that, on or before November 5, 2018, petitioner shall advise the Court 20 whether he continues to seek appointment of new counsel or whether the motion for appointment 21 of new counsel should be withdrawn. 22 23 24 The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the petitioner at his last institutional address of record. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 October 25 DATED THIS ____ day of ___________, 2018. 27 GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?