SATA GmbH & Co. KG v. Wenzhou T&E Industrial Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 46

FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT and Permanent Injunction in favor of SATA GmbH & Co. KG and against Wenzhou T&E Industrial Co., Ltd. Plaintiff is awarded Statutory damages in the amount of $2,000,000, Attorneys fees in the amount of $10,177. 83, and Costs in the amount of $901.49. The Clerk of the Court shall forthwith refund to SATA the $15,000 SATA initially placed on deposit with the Clerk of the Court. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: Finance - SLR)

Case 2:13-cv-02042-APG-NJK Document 42-2 Filed 09/09/14 Page 1 of 3

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

SATA GmbH & Co. KG, a German
corporation,

Case No. 2:13-cv-02042-APG-NJK

4

FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT
AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Plaintiff,
5
v.
6
7
8

Wenzhou T&E Industrial Co., Ltd., a foreign
business organization, CMI Continental
Marketing International Co. Ltd., a foreign
business organization, and Kuani Gear Co. Ltd.,
a foreign business organization,

9
Defendants.
10
11
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG’s Motion For Default
12
Judgment And Permanent Injunction.

The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s motion, the

13
accompanying memorandum of points and authorities, the Declaration Of Jonathan W. Fountain
14
In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Default Judgment And Permanent Injunction, the exhibits
15
attached thereto, the papers and pleadings on file in this case, and for good cause shown,
16
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion For Default Judgment And Permanent
17
Injunction is GRANTED.
18
19

1.

Default Judgment

THE COURT FINDS that Defendant Wenzhou T&E Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Wenzhou”) was
20
regularly and personally served with the Summons and Amended Complaint in this action but has
21
failed to appear and answer the Amended Complaint within the period prescribed by law, that the
22
default of Wenzhou was duly entered by the Clerk of the Court on July 28, 2014, and that Plaintiff
23
SATA GmbH & Co. KG (“SATA”) is entitled to affirmative relief against Wenzhou. Based upon
24
the foregoing findings, and good cause appearing therefore;
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff SATA be awarded judgment against Defendant
26
Wenzhou on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, as follows:
27
a.

Statutory damages in the amount of $2,000,000;

b.

Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $10,177.83;
-1-

28
4702436_1

Case 2:13-cv-02042-APG-NJK Document 42-2 Filed 09/09/14 Page 2 of 3

1

c.

Costs in the amount of $901.49; and

2

d.

Post-judgment interest on the principal sum at the judgment rate from the date of

3

entry of the Judgment until paid in full.

4

2.

5

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that, Wenzhou, and its officers, agents, servants,

6

employees, confederates, attorneys, and any persons acting in concert or participation with any of

7

them including, without limitation, third parties providing services used in connection with

8

Wenzhou’s operations and websites owned or controlled by Wenzhou (including, without

9

limitation, the website at <http://www.teautools.com>), including, Internet service providers

10

(“ISPs”), domain name registries, domain name registrars, banks and other financial institutions,

11

merchant account providers and payment processors (such as PayPal, Inc., Western Union), and

12

any other payment processing service having knowledge of this Order by service or actual notice

13

(“Restrained Parties”) are hereby permanently enjoined and restrained from:

14

a.

Permanent Injunction

Using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the SATA

15

Marks in commerce including, without limitation: (i) by selling, offering for sale, distributing,

16

promoting, or advertising any good or service in connection with such reproduction, counterfeit,

17

copy, or colorable imitation of the SATA Marks; (ii) by displaying any reproduction, counterfeit,

18

copy, or colorable imitation of the SATA Marks on the website accessible through the

19

<http://www.teautools.com> domain name or any other website owned or controlled by Wenzhou

20

or that display Wenzhou’s products (collectively, the “Enjoined Websites”); or (iii) by displaying

21

any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the SATA Marks at any trade show

22

in the United States, including but not limited to, at any future Automobile Aftermarket Products

23

Expo (“AAPEX”) trade show; and

24

b.

Manufacturing, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the United States,

25

portable electronic device cases embodying designs that are the same as or substantially similar to

26

the designs claimed in U.S. design patents 459,432 S1 and 459,433 S1, including, without

27

limitation, by: (i) offering to sell and selling such products to individuals or companies in the

28

United States through the Enjoined Websites or otherwise; or (ii) offering to sell or selling such
4702436_1

-2-

Case 2:13-cv-02042-APG-NJK Document 42-2 Filed 09/09/14 Page 3 of 3

1

products at any trade show in the United States, including, but not limited to, at any future

2

AAPEX show; and

3

3.

4

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall forthwith refund

5

to SATA the $15,000 SATA initially placed on deposit with the Clerk of the Court by mailing a

6

check in the amount of $15,000 made payable to SATA’s counsel, LEWIS ROCA

7

ROTHGERBER LLP, addressed to Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq., Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP,

8

3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600, Las Vegas, Nevada 89169.

Refund of Security Deposit

9
10

October
ENTERED THIS 22nd of _________________, 2014.
___ day

11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4702436_1

-3-