Toyo Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd. et al v. Toyama Tyre Corp., Ltd. et al

Filing 28

ORDER that the Clerk shall enter default as to all Defendants. Plaintiffs shall file a timely and appropriate Motion for Default Judgment. Denying as moot 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Adopting 27 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Toyo Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd.; Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp.; and Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas Inc., ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ) Toyama Tyre Corp., Ltd.; Toyama Tyre Corp., ) Ltd.; and Hong Kong Toyama Tyre Int’l Ltd., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-02062-GMN-NJK ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 12 Nancy J. Koppe. (ECF No. 27.) A party may file specific written objections to the findings and 13 recommendations of a Magistrate Judge, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 14 or in part, the findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Here, 15 no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has expired. The Court finds good cause for 16 entry of Clerk’s default as to all Defendants, for failure to timely file any responsive pleading. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter default as to all Defendants. Plaintiffs shall file a timely and appropriate Motion for Default Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 5) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED to the extent it is not inconsistent with this Order. DATED this 31st day of March, 2014. ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?