Toyo Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd. et al v. Toyama Tyre Corp., Ltd. et al
Filing
28
ORDER that the Clerk shall enter default as to all Defendants. Plaintiffs shall file a timely and appropriate Motion for Default Judgment. Denying as moot 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Adopting 27 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Toyo Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd.; Toyo Tire
U.S.A. Corp.; and Toyo Tire Holdings of
Americas Inc.,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
Toyama Tyre Corp., Ltd.; Toyama Tyre Corp., )
Ltd.; and Hong Kong Toyama Tyre Int’l Ltd., )
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 2:13-cv-02062-GMN-NJK
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
12
Nancy J. Koppe. (ECF No. 27.) A party may file specific written objections to the findings and
13
recommendations of a Magistrate Judge, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole
14
or in part, the findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Here,
15
no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has expired. The Court finds good cause for
16
entry of Clerk’s default as to all Defendants, for failure to timely file any responsive pleading.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter default as to all Defendants.
Plaintiffs shall file a timely and appropriate Motion for Default Judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 5)
is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED to the extent it is not inconsistent with this Order.
DATED this 31st day of March, 2014.
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?