Fernandez v. Cox et al

Filing 34

ORDER Denying 28 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. It is Further Ordered that 29 Motion for Extension of Time and 33 Motion for Continuance of Time to Respond to 30 MOTION to Dismiss are Granted. Response due by 4/10/2015. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/17/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 1 2 3 4 RENE F. FERNANDEZ, 5 Petitioner, 6 vs. 7 JAMES GREG COX, et al., 8 Case No. 2:13-cv-02158-GMN-VCF Respondents. ORDER 9 10 Petitioner has submitted a motion for reconsideration to the motion for appointment of 11 counsel (ECF No. 28). Nothing in the motion would cause the court to depart from its denial of 12 petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 19). 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Respondents have submitted a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 29). The court grants the motion and notes that respondents have filed a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30). Petitioner has submitted a motion for continuance of time (ECF No. 33). The court grants this motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for reconsideration to the motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 28) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for continuance of time (ECF No. 22 33) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have through April 10, 2015, to file and serve a response to 23 respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30). 24 DATED this 17th day of March, 2015. 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?