Morgan & Morgan, P.A. v. Eglet et al

Filing 46

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 45 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 11 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/2/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5
6

SAO

PETER S. CHRISTIANSEN
Nevada Bar No. 5254

0

ORIGINAL

KENDELEE L. WORKS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9611
EGLET WALL CHRISTIANSEN

400 South 7^ Street, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Ph.: [phone]
Fx.: [phone]

7

U N I T E D S TAT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T
8

D I S T R I C T O F N E VA D A

9
10

MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.,

11

C A S E N O . 2 : 1 3 - c v - 0 2 2 1 0 - G M N - PA L

Plaintiff,

12
v s .

13
14
15

16
17

ROBERT EGLET, an individual, ROBERT
ADAMS, an individual, MAINOR EGLET, a
business entity of unknown type and DOES I

through X and ROE CORPORATIONS I through
10, inclusive.
Defendants.

18
19

S T I P U L AT I O N A N D O R D E R F O R D I S M I S S A L W I T H P R E J U D I C E
20
21

COME NOW Defendants, ROBERT EGLET, ROBERT ADAMS and MAINOR

22

EGLET, by and through their counsel of record, PETER S. CHRISTIANSEN, ESQ., and

23

KENDELEE W. WORKS, ESQ., of EGLET WALL CHRISTIANSEN and PlaintifiF, MORGAN

2 4

& MORGAN, P.A., by and through their counsel of record GARY LOGAN, ESQ., and hereby

2 5
2 6
2 7
2 8

stipulate and agree as follows:
THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT the above-referenced matter shall be

dismissed in its entirety, with Prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants (ECF
No. 11) is hereby DENIED as moot.
DATED this 2nd day of September, 2014.
_______________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court