Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Gemini Insurance Company et al

Filing 26

ORDER that 7 and 10 Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 13 Motion to Seal is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF ) PENNSYLVANIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GEMINI INSURANCE CO. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 2:13-cv-02211-RCJ-PAL ORDER 14 15 Plaintiff Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania sued three Defendants in 16 diversity in this Court on December 2, 2013, seeking several declarations as to the parties’ rights 17 and responsibilities under excess liability insurance policies, as well as monetary damages under 18 theories of equitable subrogation and indemnity. No Defendant has appeared, and no evidence of 19 service appears in the record, except for a December 12, 2013 waiver of service by Defendant 20 Gemini Insurance Co. (“Gemini”) indicating that is has sixty (60) days from December 10, 2013 21 to answer or defend under Rule 12. (See Waiver of Service, Dec. 12, 2013, ECF No. 24). 22 Plaintiff, however, filed two offensive motions for summary judgment on December 3 23 and 4, 2013, respectively. No party had been served or had waived service when Plaintiff filed 24 those motions. In fact, the Clerk had not yet even issued the Summonses. Rule 56(b) permits a 25 party to file such a motion at any time before 30 days after the close of discovery. The motions 1 are therefore not technically premature. However, the time to respond to the motions in this case 2 will expire before the non-movants are required to appear and defend. It is clear that a 3 prejudicial due process violation would result from the adjudication of an offensive summary 4 judgment motion in favor of a plaintiff at a time when the relevant defendant has time remaining 5 to answer or otherwise defend, or, moreover, has not even yet been served with a summons and 6 complaint or waived service thereof. The Court will therefore deny the motions, without 7 prejudice. Plaintiff may refile the motions, if necessary, after all parties have been served, have 8 waived service, or have defaulted, and after the time to file an answer or otherwise defend under 9 Rule 12 has lapsed. 10 11 12 CONCLUSION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 7, 10) are DENIED. 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Seal (ECF No. 13) is DENIED as moot. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 Dated this 10th day of January, 2014. Dated this 27th day of December, 2013. _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?