Smith v. Wolf Performance Ammunition, et al.

Filing 34

ORDER re 33 Status Report. Any attempt to modify the Scheduling Order through a request made in a joint interim status report is improper. See LR 26-3. Accordingly, to the extent the parties intended to request to modify the Scheduling Order in their Joint Interim Status Report, that request is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/5/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
ANDREW SMITH,
9
10
11
12
13

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WOLF PERFORMANCE AMMUNITION, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:13-cv-02223-JCM-NJK
ORDER

14

The Court has received the parties’ Joint Interim Status Report, filed August 4, 2014. Docket No.

15

33. In this filing, the parties appear to request an extension of the discovery deadlines established by the

16

Scheduling Order in this case. Id., at 3; see also Docket No. 27.

17

Any attempt to modify the Scheduling Order through a request made in a joint interim status report

18

is improper. See LR 26-3. If the parties seek to modify the Scheduling Order, any request must fully

19

comply with the Local Rules of this Court. See LR 6-1, LR 7-1, and LR 26-4. Accordingly, to the extent

20

the parties intended to request to modify the Scheduling Order in their Joint Interim Status Report, that

21

request is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

DATED: August 5, 2014.

24
25
26
27
28

________________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge