Guy v. Casal Institute of Nevada, LLC et al
Filing
215
ORDER Granting 214 Stipulation to Extend Stay of Discovery to 11/30/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:13-cv-02263-RFB-GWF Document 214 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ., Bar # 3192
MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ., Bar # 10176
TIMOTHY W. ROEHRS, ESQ., Bar # 9668
KATHRYN B. BLAKEY, ESQ., Bar # 12701
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
Telephone:
702.862.8800
Fax No.:
702.862.8811
Email:
rroskelley@littler.com
Email:
mpaek@littler.com
Email:
troehrs@littler.com
Email:
kblakey@littler.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Casal Institute of Nevada, LLC dba Aveda Institute Las Vegas;
Arthur J. Petrie; John Gronvall; and Thomas Ciarniello
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 H oward Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
MARNI M. GUY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CASAL INSTITUTE OF NEVADA, LLC
DBA AVEDA INSTITUTE LAS VEGAS;
ARTHUR J. PETRIE; JOHN
GRONVALL; AND THOMAS
CIARNIELLO,
Case No. 2:13-cv-02263-RFB-GWF
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO EXTEND STAY OF DISCOVERY
[FIRST REQUEST]
Defendant.
Plaintiffs Marni Guy, et al. and Defendants Casal Institute of Nevada, LLC dba Aveda
Institute Las Vegas; Arthur J. Petrie; John Gronvall; and Thomas Ciarniello (collectively
“Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys hereby stipulate to and request that the
Court extend the stay of discovery currently in place by an additional 90 days up to and including
Thursday, November 30, 2017.
The parties request a continued stay in discovery to avoid unnecessarily incurring the
significant costs and fees associated with the approaching discovery deadlines. The parties continue
Case 2:13-cv-02263-RFB-GWF Document 214 Filed 08/18/17 Page 2 of 2
1
to agree that staying these deadlines is warranted as the Ninth Circuit has set oral argument in
2
Benjamin, et al v. B&H Education, Inc. et al for September 11, 2017. As stated in the parties initial
3
request to stay discovery, the parties agree that the decision in Benjamin, that case involving the
4
application of the Fair Labor Standards Act to the activities of cosmetology students in a
5
cosmetology school salon, may prove material to the outcome of this case. [ECF. No. 212].
6
On June 6, 2017, this Court granted the parties’ request for an initial stay until September 1,
7
2017. [ECF No. 213]. The purpose of that stay was “to see what occurs in oral argument in
8
Benjamin.”
9
Additionally, the results of the appeal will more than likely take several months from the date of the
10
oral argument to be issued. Accordingly, the parties request that the stay of discovery be extended
11
by 90 days up to and including Thursday, November 30, 2017.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Id.
The oral argument in Benjamin is currently set for September 11, 2017.
Dated: August 18, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Dana Sniegocki, Esq.
LEON GREENBERG, ESQ.
DANA SNIEGOCKI, ESQ.
LEON GREENBERG CORPORATION
/s/ Kathryn B. Blakey, Esq.
RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ.
MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ.
TIMOTHY W. ROEHRS, ESQ.
KATHRYN B. BLAKEY, ESQ.
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendants
19
20
Respectfully submitted,
22
/s/ Christian Gabroy, Esq.
CHRISTIAN GABROY, ESQ.
KAINE MESSER, ESQ.
GABROY LAW OFFICES
23
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
21st
Dated this ______ day of August, 2017.
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 H oward Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?