Guy v. Casal Institute of Nevada, LLC et al

Filing 215

ORDER Granting 214 Stipulation to Extend Stay of Discovery to 11/30/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:13-cv-02263-RFB-GWF Document 214 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ., Bar # 3192 MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ., Bar # 10176 TIMOTHY W. ROEHRS, ESQ., Bar # 9668 KATHRYN B. BLAKEY, ESQ., Bar # 12701 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 Email: rroskelley@littler.com Email: mpaek@littler.com Email: troehrs@littler.com Email: kblakey@littler.com Attorneys for Defendants Casal Institute of Nevada, LLC dba Aveda Institute Las Vegas; Arthur J. Petrie; John Gronvall; and Thomas Ciarniello UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 H oward Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 MARNI M. GUY, Plaintiff, vs. CASAL INSTITUTE OF NEVADA, LLC DBA AVEDA INSTITUTE LAS VEGAS; ARTHUR J. PETRIE; JOHN GRONVALL; AND THOMAS CIARNIELLO, Case No. 2:13-cv-02263-RFB-GWF STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND STAY OF DISCOVERY [FIRST REQUEST] Defendant. Plaintiffs Marni Guy, et al. and Defendants Casal Institute of Nevada, LLC dba Aveda Institute Las Vegas; Arthur J. Petrie; John Gronvall; and Thomas Ciarniello (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys hereby stipulate to and request that the Court extend the stay of discovery currently in place by an additional 90 days up to and including Thursday, November 30, 2017. The parties request a continued stay in discovery to avoid unnecessarily incurring the significant costs and fees associated with the approaching discovery deadlines. The parties continue Case 2:13-cv-02263-RFB-GWF Document 214 Filed 08/18/17 Page 2 of 2 1 to agree that staying these deadlines is warranted as the Ninth Circuit has set oral argument in 2 Benjamin, et al v. B&H Education, Inc. et al for September 11, 2017. As stated in the parties initial 3 request to stay discovery, the parties agree that the decision in Benjamin, that case involving the 4 application of the Fair Labor Standards Act to the activities of cosmetology students in a 5 cosmetology school salon, may prove material to the outcome of this case. [ECF. No. 212]. 6 On June 6, 2017, this Court granted the parties’ request for an initial stay until September 1, 7 2017. [ECF No. 213]. The purpose of that stay was “to see what occurs in oral argument in 8 Benjamin.” 9 Additionally, the results of the appeal will more than likely take several months from the date of the 10 oral argument to be issued. Accordingly, the parties request that the stay of discovery be extended 11 by 90 days up to and including Thursday, November 30, 2017. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Id. The oral argument in Benjamin is currently set for September 11, 2017. Dated: August 18, 2017 Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, /s/ Dana Sniegocki, Esq. LEON GREENBERG, ESQ. DANA SNIEGOCKI, ESQ. LEON GREENBERG CORPORATION /s/ Kathryn B. Blakey, Esq. RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ. MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ. TIMOTHY W. ROEHRS, ESQ. KATHRYN B. BLAKEY, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants 19 20 Respectfully submitted, 22 /s/ Christian Gabroy, Esq. CHRISTIAN GABROY, ESQ. KAINE MESSER, ESQ. GABROY LAW OFFICES 23 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 21st Dated this ______ day of August, 2017. 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 H oward Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?