Campbell v. Cox et al

Filing 31

ORDER denying as moot 29 Motion to proceed to prove allegations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
JERMAINE J. CAMPBELL,

13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

14

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed to prove allegations, filed on April

15

6, 2015. Docket No. 29. The Court has considered Plaintiff’s motion and Defendants’ response.

16

Docket Nos. 29, 30. Plaintiff did not file a reply. See Docket. The Court finds that this motion is

17

properly resolved without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-2

9
Plaintiff(s),
10
vs.
11
GREG COX, et al.,
12
Defendant(s).

Case No. 2:13-cv-02303-JAD-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 29)

18

Plaintiff represents that discovery is necessary in order to “get the evidence needed to prove

19

the allegations brought forth against the defendants in this case.” Docket No. 29, at 1. Pursuant to

20

the scheduling order entered on March 24, 2015, the current deadline for discovery is June 22, 2015.

21

Docket No. 27, at 2. Thus, Plaintiff is permitted to seek discovery from Defendants pursuant to the

22

scheduling order. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed to prove allegations (Docket No. 29)

23

is DENIED as moot.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

DATED: May 18, 2015

26
27
28
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge