In Re: David Lee Collins

Filing 21

ORDER denying 13 Motion; denying 20 Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/5/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 In re: DAVID LEE COLLINS, 6 Petitioner. 7 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-02312-GMN-GWF ORDER 8 9 Pending before the Court is Petitioner David Lee Collins’ (“Petitioner”) Application for 10 Leave to Present Tender of Payment. (ECF No. 20). Also pending before the Court is 11 Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Special Order No. 108. (ECF No. 13). 12 Petitioner initiated this action on December 19, 2013. (ECF No. 2). The Court 13 instructed him to either pay the required filing fee or file a proper motion to proceed in forma 14 pauperis. (ECF No. 3). Petitioner failed to comply with the Court’s Order, and the case was 15 dismissed with prejudice on October 6, 2014. (ECF No. 9). Thereafter, Petitioner filed multiple 16 motions apparently attempting to resolve the initial dispute and settle an alleged debt. (ECF 17 Nos. 15, 16). As the Court already dismissed Petitioner’s case, these motions were denied as 18 moot. (ECF No. 17). 19 In the instant motions, Petitioner again attempts to settle some form of debt. Petitioner 20 also challenges the sufficiency of Special Order No. 108, which has since been replaced by 21 Local Rules Part IC. Neither of Petitioner’s motions have any basis in this already dismissed 22 action. Accordingly, 23 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Application for Leave to Present Tender of Payment, (ECF No. 20), is DENIED. 25 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Special Order No. 108, (ECF No. 13), is DENIED. 5 DATED this _____ day of December, 2016. 4 5 6 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?