In Re: David Lee Collins
Filing
21
ORDER denying 13 Motion; denying 20 Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/5/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
In re:
DAVID LEE COLLINS,
6
Petitioner.
7
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:13-cv-02312-GMN-GWF
ORDER
8
9
Pending before the Court is Petitioner David Lee Collins’ (“Petitioner”) Application for
10
Leave to Present Tender of Payment. (ECF No. 20). Also pending before the Court is
11
Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Special Order No. 108. (ECF No. 13).
12
Petitioner initiated this action on December 19, 2013. (ECF No. 2). The Court
13
instructed him to either pay the required filing fee or file a proper motion to proceed in forma
14
pauperis. (ECF No. 3). Petitioner failed to comply with the Court’s Order, and the case was
15
dismissed with prejudice on October 6, 2014. (ECF No. 9). Thereafter, Petitioner filed multiple
16
motions apparently attempting to resolve the initial dispute and settle an alleged debt. (ECF
17
Nos. 15, 16). As the Court already dismissed Petitioner’s case, these motions were denied as
18
moot. (ECF No. 17).
19
In the instant motions, Petitioner again attempts to settle some form of debt. Petitioner
20
also challenges the sufficiency of Special Order No. 108, which has since been replaced by
21
Local Rules Part IC. Neither of Petitioner’s motions have any basis in this already dismissed
22
action. Accordingly,
23
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Application for Leave to Present Tender
of Payment, (ECF No. 20), is DENIED.
25
Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Special Order No.
108, (ECF No. 13), is DENIED.
5
DATED this _____ day of December, 2016.
4
5
6
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?