Witt v. Hampton & Hampton et al
Filing
27
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 21 Motion to Compel Silverstone Ranch Community Association to Respond to Plaintiff's Subpoena Duces Tecum. Silverstone Ranch Community Association's Responses due by 6/9/2014. The Motion Hearing set for 5/12/2014 on Plaintiff's 21 Motion to Compel is Vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/8/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copy of Order mailed to Silverstone Ranch Community Association - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
MARK W. WITT,
8
9
10
11
12
13
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HAMPTON & HAMPTON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-02344-GMN-GWF
ORDER
Motion to Compel (#21)
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Non-Party Silverstone Ranch
14
Community Association’s (“Silverstone”) Response to Plaintiff’s Subpoena Duces Tecum (#21), filed
15
on April 9, 2014. No opposition was filed in this matter.
16
This case involves the non-judicial foreclosure sale of Plaintiff’s residence. See Doc. #21 at pg.
17
3 ¶ 4. Non-party Silverstone is the homeowner’s association for the residence. Id. at pg. 5 ¶ 8.
18
Plaintiff served Silvertsone with a subpoena duces tecum on February 10, 2014. See Doc. #21 at pg. 3 ¶
19
6. Therein, Plaintiff requested Silverstone produce certain documents on or before March 5, 2014 that
20
are pertinent to the pending litigation. Id. Plaintiff alleges that Silverstone did not object to the
21
Supboena nor has it produced the requested documents. Id. at ¶ 7. Plaintiff’s attempts to contact
22
Silverstone have been futile. Id. at ¶¶8-9. Plaintiff wishes to review the documents identified in his
23
subpoena duces tecum before proceeding with any depositions. See Doc. #19 at pg. 5 ¶¶ 11-15.
24
Plaintiff therefore moves the Court to compel non-party Silverstone to respond to his requests in the
25
subpoena duces tecum See Doc. #21 at pg. 3 ¶ 6.
26
Rule 45(d)(2)(B) states that a person commanded to produce documents may serve on the party
27
designated in the subpoena a written objection . The objection must be served before the earlier of the
28
time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(2)(B).
1
Furthermore, Rule 45(d)(2)(B)(ii) permits the serving party to move the Court for an order compelling
2
production where compliance is required.
3
Here, Plaintiff served Silverstone with a subpoena duces tecum on February 10, 2014, therein
4
requesting the production of certain documents pertinent to the pending litigation. Silverstone neither
5
objected to nor produced the documents requested. Despite numerous telephone calls and written
6
correspondence from Plaintiff’s counsel, Silverstone continues to flout its duty to respond.
7
Furthermore, after receiving a notice of hearing on Plaintiff’s pending motion to compel, neither
8
opposing counsel nor Silverstone filed an opposition in the matter. Local Rule 7-2(d) states that the
9
failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a
10
consent to the granting of the motion. The Court therefore finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s motion
11
to compel. Accordingly,
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Silverstone Ranch Community
13
Association’s Response to Plaintiff’s Subpoena Duces Tecum (#21) is granted. Silverstone Ranch
14
Community Association shall have until June 9, 2014 to respond to Plaintiff’s subpoena duces tecum.
15
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail a copy of this order to
16
Silverstone Ranch Community Association at the following address:
17
18
19
Silverstone Ranch Community Association
c/o First Service Residential Nevada, LLC
8290 Arville Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
20
21
22
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion hearing set for Monday, May 12, 2014 on
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (#21) is vacated.
DATED this 8th day of May, 2014.
24
25
26
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?