Witt v. Hampton & Hampton et al

Filing 27

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 21 Motion to Compel Silverstone Ranch Community Association to Respond to Plaintiff's Subpoena Duces Tecum. Silverstone Ranch Community Association's Responses due by 6/9/2014. The Motion Hearing set for 5/12/2014 on Plaintiff's 21 Motion to Compel is Vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/8/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copy of Order mailed to Silverstone Ranch Community Association - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 MARK W. WITT, 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HAMPTON & HAMPTON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:13-cv-02344-GMN-GWF ORDER Motion to Compel (#21) This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Non-Party Silverstone Ranch 14 Community Association’s (“Silverstone”) Response to Plaintiff’s Subpoena Duces Tecum (#21), filed 15 on April 9, 2014. No opposition was filed in this matter. 16 This case involves the non-judicial foreclosure sale of Plaintiff’s residence. See Doc. #21 at pg. 17 3 ¶ 4. Non-party Silverstone is the homeowner’s association for the residence. Id. at pg. 5 ¶ 8. 18 Plaintiff served Silvertsone with a subpoena duces tecum on February 10, 2014. See Doc. #21 at pg. 3 ¶ 19 6. Therein, Plaintiff requested Silverstone produce certain documents on or before March 5, 2014 that 20 are pertinent to the pending litigation. Id. Plaintiff alleges that Silverstone did not object to the 21 Supboena nor has it produced the requested documents. Id. at ¶ 7. Plaintiff’s attempts to contact 22 Silverstone have been futile. Id. at ¶¶8-9. Plaintiff wishes to review the documents identified in his 23 subpoena duces tecum before proceeding with any depositions. See Doc. #19 at pg. 5 ¶¶ 11-15. 24 Plaintiff therefore moves the Court to compel non-party Silverstone to respond to his requests in the 25 subpoena duces tecum See Doc. #21 at pg. 3 ¶ 6. 26 Rule 45(d)(2)(B) states that a person commanded to produce documents may serve on the party 27 designated in the subpoena a written objection . The objection must be served before the earlier of the 28 time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(2)(B). 1 Furthermore, Rule 45(d)(2)(B)(ii) permits the serving party to move the Court for an order compelling 2 production where compliance is required. 3 Here, Plaintiff served Silverstone with a subpoena duces tecum on February 10, 2014, therein 4 requesting the production of certain documents pertinent to the pending litigation. Silverstone neither 5 objected to nor produced the documents requested. Despite numerous telephone calls and written 6 correspondence from Plaintiff’s counsel, Silverstone continues to flout its duty to respond. 7 Furthermore, after receiving a notice of hearing on Plaintiff’s pending motion to compel, neither 8 opposing counsel nor Silverstone filed an opposition in the matter. Local Rule 7-2(d) states that the 9 failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a 10 consent to the granting of the motion. The Court therefore finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s motion 11 to compel. Accordingly, 12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Silverstone Ranch Community 13 Association’s Response to Plaintiff’s Subpoena Duces Tecum (#21) is granted. Silverstone Ranch 14 Community Association shall have until June 9, 2014 to respond to Plaintiff’s subpoena duces tecum. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail a copy of this order to 16 Silverstone Ranch Community Association at the following address: 17 18 19 Silverstone Ranch Community Association c/o First Service Residential Nevada, LLC 8290 Arville Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 20 21 22 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion hearing set for Monday, May 12, 2014 on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (#21) is vacated. DATED this 8th day of May, 2014. 24 25 26 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?