Grisham v. Eighth Judicial District Family Court et al

Filing 19

ORDER Granting Defendants' 18 Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply to 12 MOTION to Stay During the Pendency of 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 4/18/2014. Defendants' 17 Motion to Strike is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MICHAEL H. GRISHAM, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FAMILY COURT ) OF CLARK COUNTY NEVADA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-02349-JCM-NJK ORDER (Docket Nos. 17, 18) 15 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motions to strike Plaintiff’s response to the motion 16 to stay or, alternatively, to extend the deadline to file a reply to the motion to stay discovery. Docket 17 Nos. 17, 18. For good cause shown, the motion to extend is hereby GRANTED and Defendants’ 18 reply shall be filed no later than April 18, 2014. The motion to strike is hereby DENIED, but the 19 Court reminds Plaintiff that he is required to abide by all Court orders and that failure to do so in the 20 future may result in sanctions up to and including dismissal of his claims. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: April 16, 2014 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?