Lyons v. Cox et al

Filing 49

ORDER. The Court once again ORDERS the parties to file a joint proposed discovery plan, this time no later than August 13, 2015. Failure to comply with this order will result in issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/6/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9

PHILLIP J. LYONS,

10

Plaintiff(s),
vs.

11
JAMES G. COX, et al.,
12
Defendant(s).
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-00046-RFB-NJK
ORDER

14

On June 5, 2015, the court ordered the parties to meet-and-confer, and to file a joint proposed

15

discovery plan no later than August 5, 2015. Docket No. 39. To date, no such discovery plan has been

16

filed.1 The Court once again ORDERS the parties to file a joint proposed discovery plan, this time no

17

later than August 13, 2015. Failure to comply with this order will result in issuance of an order to show

18

cause why sanctions should not be imposed.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

DATED: August 6, 2015

21

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

In the interim, a motion to dismiss was filed by the United States. Docket No. 41. The filing of
a dispositive motion does not automatically stay parties’ discovery obligations. Kor Media Group, LLC v.
Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013) (quoting Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 602-03
(D. Nev. 2011)); see also Ministerio Roca Solida v. U.S. Dept. Of Fish & Wildlife, 288 F.R.D. 500, 501, 502
(D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013) (same in case in which federal defendants brought motion to dismiss asserting
sovereign immunity). If a stay of discovery is sought by any or all parties, an appropriate request must be
filed addressing the relevant standards.