Martin v. Smith et al
Filing
6
ORDER Adopting in full Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen's 4 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 5 Complaint is Dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/7/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
ANTHONY MARTIN,
4
5
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
vs.
DOUGLAS SMITH, MICHAEL PETERS,
INGRID PATIN, LLOYD BAKER, and
LLOYDS SUMMIT INSURANCE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:14-cv-0134-GMN-PAL
ORDER
10
11
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
12
Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen, (ECF No. 4), which states that Plaintiff Anthony Martin’s
13
Complaint, (ECF No. 5), should be dismissed with prejudice.
14
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a
15
United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);
16
D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo
17
determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,
18
or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is
20
not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an
21
objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized
22
that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
23
where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
24
1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
25
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. Accordingly,
Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 4), is
ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint, (ECF No. 5), is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
DATED this 7th day of November, 2014.
6
7
8
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?