United States of America v. Marcu
Filing
31
ORDER Granting 30 Motion to Permit Appearance of Government Attorneys Danielle K. Schuessler and Kirsten L. Daeubler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:14-cv-00159-RFB-CWH Document 30 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 4
1 DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
2 District of Nevada
ROGER W. WENTHE
3 Assistant United States Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 8920
4 United States Attorney’s Office
333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite5000
5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: 702-388-6336
6 Facsimile: 702-388-6787
Email: roger.wenthe@usdoj.gov
7
Attorneys for the United States.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
15 RAZVAN MARCU,
16
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:14-cv-159-RFB-CWH
17
MOTION TO PERMIT APPEARANCE OF GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS
18
Pursuant to LR IA 10-3, the United States of America respectfully requests that this
19 honorable Court admit Government attorneys Danielle K. Schuessler and Kirsten L. Daeubler to
20 practice in the District of Nevada for the above-captioned case and in all matters in this district
21 during the period of their employment by the United States. Rule IA 10-3 provides:
22
23
24
25
26
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any nonresident attorney who is a member
in good standing of the highest court of any state, commonwealth, territory, or the
District of Columbia, who is employed by the United States as an attorney and,
while being so employed, has occasion to appear in this Court on behalf of the
United States, shall, upon motion of the United States Attorney or the Federal
Public Defender for this district or one of the assistants, be permitted to practice
before this court during the period of such employment.
Case 2:14-cv-00159-RFB-CWH Document 30 Filed 01/20/15 Page 2 of 4
Ms. Schuessler is an attorney with the Department of Justice, Office of Immigration
1
2
Litigation, an agency of the federal government, and is a member in good standing of the Maryland
3 Bar, admitted in 2011.
4
Ms. Daeubler is an attorney with the Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation,
5 an agency of the federal government, and is a member in good standing of the Pennsylvania and
6
New Jersey Bars, admitted to each in 2006.
7
The following contact information is provided to the Court:
8
Danielle K. Schuessler
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation|District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
T: (202) 305-9698
danielle.k.schuessler@usdoj.gov
9
10
11
12
13
Kirsten L. Daeubler
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division
Office of Immigration Litigation/District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
T: 202.616.4458
Kirsten.Daeubler@usdoj.gov
14
15
16
17
18
Accordingly, the United States respectfully requests that an order be issued allowing Danielle
19
20 K. Schuessler and Kirsten L. Daeubler to practice before this honorable Court.
21
22
///
///
23
24
25
///
///
26 ///
2
Case 2:14-cv-00159-RFB-CWH Document 30 Filed 01/20/15 Page 3 of 4
1
Dated: January 20, 2015
2
Respectfully Submitted,
3
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
4
5
/s/ Roger W. Wenthe
ROGER W. WENTHE
Assistant United States Attorney
6
7
Attorneys for the United States
8
9
ORDER
10
It is so ordered.
11
DATED: January 21, 2015
______________________________
12
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Case 2:14-cv-00159-RFB-CWH Document 30 Filed 01/20/15 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on
3 the party shown, by the method shown, on the date shown.
4
CM/ECF
5
Dan M. Winder, Esq.
3507 W. Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89102
6
7
Dated: January 20, 2015
8
9
10
/s/ Roger Wenthe
Roger W. Wenthe
Assistant United States Attorney
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?