Lopez De Gomez v. Ceasars Entertainment Corporation et al
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach, on 6/23/2014 by Deputy Clerk: Ari Caytuero. IT IS ORDERED that 28 Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs and 30 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to File Opposition to 28 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs are DENIED without prejudice as Moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 06/23/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) Modified on 6/23/2014 (AC).
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
***
5
6
CELIA LOPEZ DE GOMEZ,
Plaintiff,
7
8
vs.
9
2:14-cv-00208-RCJ-VCF
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT
CORPORATION, et al.,
MINUTE ORDER
10
Defendants.
11
Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Following Plaintiff’s
12
Failure to Appear at the Early Neutral Evaluation Held on May 19, 2014 (#28) and Plaintiff’s Motion for
13
Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Following
14
Plaintiff’s Failure to appear at the Early Neutral Evaluation Held on May 19, 2014 (#30).
15
On June 17, 2014, the Court held a status conference and parties reached a settlement. The
16
parties were ordered to file the Stipulation and Order for Dismissal by August 18, 2014. (#31).
17
Accordingly,
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs
19
Following Plaintiff’s Failure to Appear at the Early Neutral Evaluation Held on May 19, 2014 (#28) and
20
Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees
21
and Costs Following Plaintiff’s Failure to appear at the Early Neutral Evaluation Held on May 19, 2014
22
(#30) are DENIED without prejudice as MOOT.
23
DATED this 23rd day of June, 2014.
24
25
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?