Scovil et al v. Medtronic Incorporated et al

Filing 94

ORDER Granting 93 Stipulation to Further Stay Proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 J Christopher Jorgensen Nevada Bar No. 5382 Dale Kotchka-Alanes Nevada Bar No. 13168 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP 3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 600 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 949-8200 E-mail: cjorgensen@lrrc.com E-mail: mkotchkaalanes@lrrc.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 Michael K. Brown (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) REED SMITH LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514 Telephone: (213)457-8000 E-mai1: mkbrown@reedsmith.com Attorneys for Defendant Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., and Medtronic Vertelink, Inc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 BRETT SCOV1L, Case No. 2:14-cv-00213-APG-VCF 14 Plaintiff, vs. JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO FURTHER STAY PROCEEDINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., and MEDTRONIC VERTELINK, INC., Assigned to Honorable Andrew P. Gordon Referred to Mag. Judge Cam Ferenbach 15 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 Compl. Filed: October 15, 2013 Am. Compl. Filed: April 2, 2014 Pursuant to the Court’s March 10, 2017 Order, Plaintiff Brett Scovil and Defendants 21 Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., and Medtronic Verterlink, Inc. 22 (collectively, “Medtronic”) submit the following joint status report and stipulation to further 23 stay proceedings. 24 25 26 The parties reached a confidential settlement of this case, and all deadlines in this action were stayed to permit the parties to engage in settlement discussions. Since filing the last stipulation to stay the proceedings, Plaintiff and the other 27 claimants involved in this global settlement have continued to work diligently with 28 Medtronic and the settlement administrator to advance the progress of the settlement. The 101521838_1 1 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO FURTHER STAY PROCEEDINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 only remaining obstacle to the dismissal of this action and a settlement payment being made 2 to Plaintiff is Plaintiff’s final resolution of a lien claim by health insurer, Humana 3 Inc. Plaintiff anticipates that Humana’s lien claim will be able to be resolved within 30-60 4 days. 5 Based on the substantial progress that has been made in this settlement process, no 6 purpose will be served by lifting the stay where the parties expect that settlement will be 7 completed. Accordingly, in order to conserve the resources of the Court and the parties, and 8 to allow the time needed to finalize the settlement, the parties respectfully request that the 9 Court stay this action for three months from the entry of the Court’s Order. Should the 10 parties finalize a settlement prior to that time, the parties will promptly notify the court by 11 voluntarily dismissing the action with prejudice. 12 13 14 15 Should this action not be dismissed by that time, the parties shall submit a status report and request for continued stay on or before the expiration of the stay. DATED this 8th day of June, 2017. HAMILTON LAW LLC LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP By /s/ Ryan A. Hamilton Ryan A. Hamilton By /s/ J Christopher Jorgensen J Christopher Jorgensen Attorneys for Plaintiff REED SMITH LLP 16 17 18 19 By /s/ Michael K. Brown Michael K. Brown (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a status hearing is scheduled for 1:00 PM, September 18, 2017, in courtroom 3D. Attorneys for Defendants Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., and Medtronic Vertelink, Inc. ORDER 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge 28 DATED: June 8, 2017 101521838_1 2 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO FURTHER STAY PROCEEDINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?