Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al

Filing 172

ORDER granting 171 Stipulation to Stay Briefing re: 156 Motion for Attorney Fees. Responses due by 9/17/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
DAYLE ELIESON Interim United States Attorney BLAINE T. WELSH Assistant United States Attorney Nevada State Bar No. 4790 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 5000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: 702-388-6336 Facsimile: 702-388-6787 Email: blaine.welsh@usdoj.gov JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General LUTHER L. HAJEK Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division 999 18th Street, South Terrace, Suite 370 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: 303-844-1376 Facsimile: 303-844-1350 Email: luke.hajek@usdoj.gov Counsel for Federal Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA SOUTHERN DIVISION CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants, and SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-00226-APG-VCF FOURTH STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO STAY BRIEFING RE: PLAINTIFFS WHITE PINE COUNTY, ET AL.’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS Page 1 of 5 ORDER Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) WHITE PINE COUNTY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND ) MANAGEMENT, et al., ) ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER ) AUTHORITY, ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) _____________________________________ ) Case No. 2:14-cv-00228-APG-VCF (Consolidated) To facilitate ongoing settlement discussions regarding the motion for attorneys’ fees and costs filed by Plaintiffs White Pine County, et al. (“the County”) in this case, the County and Defendants U.S. Bureau of Land Management, et al. (“Federal Defendants”) hereby stipulate to and respectfully request that the Court enter an order further staying briefing on the County’s motion for fees and costs for an additional 60 days, until September 17, 2018. In support of this motion, the County and Federal Defendants stipulate as follows: 1. On January 22, 2018, the County filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs (ECF No. 156) and a stipulation and joint motion to stay briefing on that motion (ECF No. 157). 2. On January 23, 2018, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation and joint motion to stay briefing and ordered briefing stayed for 60 days to allow time for settlement discussions regarding the County’s motion (ECF No. 158). On March 19, 2018, the Court granted the parties’ second stipulation and joint motion to stay briefing and extended the stay of briefing until May 18, 2018 (ECF Nos. 163 & 164). And on May 16, 2018, the Court granted the parties’ Page 2 of 5 third stipulation and joint motion to stay briefing and extended the stay to July 17, 2018 (ECF No. 168). 3. The County and Federal Defendants agree that progress has been made in negotiations, and that briefing and argument on the County’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs may be unnecessary in light of the parties’ ongoing attempt to settle this issue. The County and Federal Defendants agree that they need additional time beyond July 17, 2018 to conduct additional negotiations to reach a settlement as to the County’s motion. 4. Accordingly, the County and Federal Defendants agree that briefing on the County’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs should be further stayed for an additional 60 days, until September 17, 2018. At that time, the parties will either jointly propose a briefing schedule to address the County’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, or apprise the Court of the status of the County’s motion and any request for action by the Court. Based on the foregoing, the County and Federal Defendants respectfully request that the Court further stay briefing and argument on the County’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs for an additional 60 days until September 17, 2018. Dated this 17th day of July, 2018. Respectfully submitted, IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 18, 2018. /s/ Simeon Herskovits_________________ Simeon Herskovits (NV Bar No. 11155) Iris Thornton, pro hac vice Advocates for Community and Environment P.O. Box 1075 El Prado, New Mexico 87529 Telephone: 575-758-7202 simeon@communityandenvironment.net Michael C. Wheable (NV Bar No. 12518) White Pine County District Attorney County Courthouse Page 3 of 5 801 Clark Street, Suite 3 Ely, Nevada 89301 Telephone: 775-293-6565 MWheable@whitepinecountynv.gov Attorneys for Plaintiffs White Pine County, et al. DAYLE ELIESON Interim United States Attorney BLAINE T. WELSH Assistant United States Attorney Nevada State Bar No. 4790 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 5000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: 702-388-6336 Facsimile: 702-388-6787 Email: blaine.welsh@usdoj.gov JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General /s/ Luther L. Hajek______________ LUTHER L. HAJEK Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division 999 18th Street, South Terrace, Suite 370 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: 303-844-1376 Facsimile: 303-844-1350 Email: luke.hajek@usdoj.gov STACEY BOSSHARDT Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section United States Department of Justice Environment & natural Resources Division 601 D Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-514-2912 Facsimile: 202-305-0274 Email: stacey.bosshardt@usdoj.gov Of Counsel: Page 4 of 5 Stephen R. Palmer Assistant Regional Solicitor Office of the Regional Solicitor Department of the Interior 2800 Cottage Way, Room E-1712 Sacramento, California 95825-1890 Counsel for Federal Defendants IT IS SO ORDERED: _______________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?