Woodard v. Cox et al

Filing 51

ORDER Granting 50 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to 49 Amended Complaint. Romeo Aranas, Benedicto Gutierrez, Fransisco Sanchez, Brian Williams answer due 9/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/8/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 GUY R. WOODWARD, 12 Plaintiff(s), 13 vs. 14 JAMES COX, et al., 15 Defendant(s). 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-00272-RFB-NJK ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND (Docket No. 50) 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to extend the deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s 18 third-amended complaint. Docket No. 50. The motion indicates that, inter alia, Plaintiff’s counsel has 19 indicated that he will not oppose the motion. Docket No. 50-1 at 2. For good cause shown, the motion 20 to extend is hereby GRANTED. Defendants’ response shall be filed no later than September 23, 2015. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: September 8, 2015 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?