Stallings v. Andersons Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER that the parties shall file a Proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by 5/19/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/12/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

JAMES F. STALLINGS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ANDERSONS, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:14-cv-00279-JAD-CWH
ORDER

12
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a proposed stipulated discovery
13
plan and scheduling order. The Complaint (#1) in this matter was filed on February 24, 2014.
14
Accordingly, the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared on March 21, 2014. Pursuant to
15
Local Rule (“LR”) 26-1(d), the parties were required to meet and confer pursuant to Federal Rule
16
of Civil Procedure 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared.
17
In addition, LR 26-1(d) requires the parties to file a proposed stipulated discovery plan and
18
scheduling order within 14 days after the mandatory scheduling conference. To date, the parties
19
have not complied with LR 26-1(d).
20
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a proposed stipulated discovery plan
22
and scheduling order by May 19, 2014.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit the proposed stipulated
24
discovery plan and scheduling order in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 and LR 26-4 of
25
the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
26
DATED this 12th day of May, 2014.
27
28

_______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge