Tarr et al v. Narconon Fresh Start

Filing 56

ORDER denying without prejudice 52 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
CATHY TARR, et al.,

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to stay pending ruling on motion to transfer

17

and consolidate case for multidistrict litigation. Docket No. 52. The Court has considered Plaintiffs’

18

motion, Defendant’s response, and Plaintiffs’ reply. Docket No. 52, 54, 55. Upon review, the

19

motions appear to be based upon the misunderstanding that there are no pending motions in this case.

20

See Docket No. 54, at 7 (“[T]here are no pending motions in this case. . .”); Docket No. 55, at 1

21

(“Plaintiffs agree with [Defendant’s] position.”). There are, however, two pending dispositive

22

motions. See Docket Nos. 6, 20. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion to stay is DENIED without

23

prejudice.

11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
NARCONON FRESH START,
14
Defendant(s).

24

ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO STAY
(Docket No. 52)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Case No. 2:14-cv-00283-GMN-NJK

DATED: November 17, 2014

26
27
28

NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge