McLaine v. Clark County, Nevada et al
Filing
115
ORDER Granting 114 Stipulation re 109 and 110 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment . (Responses due by 4/18/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:14-cv-00288-JAD-GWF Document 114 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 4
1
Paul S. Padda, Esq. (NV Bar #10417)
Email: psp@paulpaddalaw.com
PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC
4240 West Flamingo Road, Suite 220
Las Vegas, Nevada 89 1 03
Tele: (702)366-1888
2
3
4
Fax:(702) 366-1940
5
Attorney for the Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9 1 SHENDONNA SOPHIA McLAINE,
Plaintiff,
10
)
)
)
) Case No. 2:14-cv-0288-JAD-GWF
11
v.
12
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA; et. al.,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
15
16
(SECOND REQUEST)
17
18
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) and the Court's Local Rule of
19
Civil Practice ("LRCP") 7-1, the parties respectfully request that the Court extend the current
20
deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Pacer #109 and
21
#1 10) to and until April 1 8, 2017 (Tuesday). This is the parties' second request for an extension
22
of time. Plaintiffs current deadline is April 3, 2017.
23
In support of this stipulation, the parties wish to advise the Court of the following:
24
1.
This is a civil rights case involving five separate Defendants. Each
25
Defendant moved for summary judgment on January 30, 2017.
26
.
.
Case 2:14-cv-00288-JAD-GWF Document 114 Filed 04/03/17 Page 2 of 4
1
2.
Plaintiffs counsel has requested counsel for Defendants agree to this
2 II stipulation based upon his current trial/work schedule and the need to devote sufficient time to
3
preparing responses to Defendants' dispositive motions. In support of this request. Plaintiffs
4
counsel cites the fact that he has been in trial since March 20, 2017 in David Moradi v. Nevada
5
Property 1. LLC, et. al.. Clark County District Court (case number A-14-698824-C). Trial in that
6
matter is ongoing and expected to last approximately two more weeks. Although undersigned
7
counsel is not the sole attorney representing Plaintiff in the Moradi case, his presence at trial
8
proceedings is required.
9
3.
Counsel for Defendants do not oppose Plaintiffs request for additional time to
10
respond to the dispositive motions provided they are allowed 30-days to file a reply to any
11
response that may be filed by Plaintiff. Obviously, given his own request, Plaintiffs counsel has
12
no issue with providing Defendants additional time to file replies.
13
4.
The additional time requested herein should provide sufficient time for Plaintiffs
14
counsel to complete and file an appropriate response.
15
.
.
16
.
.
17
.
.
18
.
.
19
.
.
20
.
.
22
.
.
23
.
.
24
.
.
25
.
.
21
26
2
Case 2:14-cv-00288-JAD-GWF Document 114 Filed 04/03/17 Page 3 of 4
1
5.
The parties respectfully request that the Court approve this stipulation.
2
3
4
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
L. CknMwous
/s/ VoajX S. Payday
Lucinda L. Coumou, Esq.
Chief Deputy District Attorney, Civil Division
5
Clark County District Attorney's Office
6
Attorney for Defendant Clark County, Nevada
7
Paul S. Padda, Esq.
Paul Padda Law
Dated: April 3, 2017
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: April 3, 2017
8
/s/ NcrcL E. Eid^vwrey
9
10
Robert W. Freeman, Jr., Esq.
Noel E. Eidsmore, Esq.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith
11
12
Attorney for Officers Friedman and Zaccara
and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
13
Dated: April 3, 2017
14
IT IS SO ORDERED:
15
The Court hereby approves the parties' stipulation for
extension of the current deadline for responding to the
16
motions for summary judgment filed on January 30,
2017 (Pacer #109 and #110). Plaintiff's responses shall
be due on or before April 18, 2017 and each Defendant
shall have 30-days after Plaintiff files a response to
17
18
submit a reply (if any).
19
20
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: April 4, 2017,
Dated: April
21
22
23
24
25
26
,2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?