Chicago Insurance Company v. Kummer, Kaempfer, Bonner, Renshaw and Ferrario et al

Filing 67

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a hearing on the Joint Unopposed Motion/Stipulation to Allow Parties in the Underlying Action to Participate in Settlement Conference Concerning the Pending Insurance Coverage Action 66 is scheduled for 11:00 a. m., 12/9/15, in courtroom 3D. Counsel for parties in this action are directed to invite counsel from Hutchison & Steffan (representative of the Quon Estate) and Spilotro & Kulla, Chtd. (representative of person and/or entities involved in the underlying fact pattern), to join the hearing on 12/9/15. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 6 7 8 9 CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. KUMMER KAEMPFER, BONNER RENSHAW AND FERRARO, et al., 2:14-cv-00308-RFB-VCF ORDER Defendants. 10 Before the court is the Joint Unopposed Motion/Stipulation to Allow Parties in the Underlying 11 Action to Participate in Settlement Conference Concerning the Pending Insurance Coverage Action (#66). 12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a hearing on the Joint Unopposed Motion/Stipulation to Allow 13 Parties in the Underlying Action to Participate in Settlement Conference Concerning the Pending 14 Insurance Coverage Action (#66) is scheduled for 11:00 a.m., December 9, 2015, in courtroom 3D. 15 Counsel for parties in this action are directed to invite counsel from Hutchison & Steffan 16 (representative of the Quon Estate) and Spilotro & Kulla, Chtd. (representative of person and/or entities 17 involved in the underlying fact pattern), to join the hearing on December 9, 2015. 18 DATED this 4th day of December, 2015. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?