Lee et al v. University Medical Center of Southern Nevada

Filing 77

ORDER that 55 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal is GRANTED. Plaintiff Nergui Terbish's claims against efendant are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/7/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 MEDERICK LEE, et al., 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 10 11 Case No. 2:14-CV-328 JCM (CWH) ORDER v. UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is the matter of Lee et al. v. University Medical Center of 14 15 Southern Nevada (case no. 2:14-cv-00328-JCM-CWH). On March 3, 2014, plaintiff Nergui Terbish, along with four other plaintiffs, filed a 16 17 18 19 complaint against defendant for damages and unjust enrichment. (Doc. #1). Plaintiff Nergui Terbish filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). (Doc. # 55). Defendant did not file an opposition to the motion. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the court may dismiss an action at plaintiff’s request 20 21 on terms the court considers proper. Here, plaintiff alleges that she no longer desires to participate in this suit. The court finds 22 23 that there will be no prejudice to any remaining party in this matter if dismissal is granted. Accordingly, 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Nergui 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge Terbish’s motion for voluntary dismissal (doc. # 55) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. ... ... 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Nergui Terbish’s claims against defendant are dismissed without prejudice. DATED December 7, 2015. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?