Winsor v. Colvin
Filing
27
ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Accepting 26 Report and Recommendation, denying 21 Motion filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Remand to Agency filed by Janora R. Winsor. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
JANORA R. WINSOR,
5
Plaintiff,
vs.
6
7
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
8
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:14-cv-00347-GMN-PAL
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT &
RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE PEGGY A. LEEN
9
10
11
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 26), of
the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, entered September 12, 2016.
12
Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by September 26, 2016. No
13
objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the
14
Court has reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Magistrate Judge Peggy A.
15
Leen’s Recommendation should be accepted.
16
Accordingly,
17
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 26), is ACCEPTED.
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Janora Winsor’s Motion to Reverse/Remand, (ECF
19
No. 18), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Commissioner’s final decision
20
in this matter is remanded for further proceedings pursuant to the Report and Recommendation,
21
(ECF No. 26).
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Carolyn Colvin’s Cross-Motion to Affirm, (ECF No.
21), is DENIED.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case.
4
26
DATED this _____ day of January, 2017.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?