Marteney v. Eastman Outdoors, Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER that 7 Motion to Extend Time is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/17/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8

REBECCA MARTENEY,

9

2:14-CV-351 JCM (PAL)

Plaintiff(s),

10
11

v.
EASTMAN OUTDOORS, INC., et al.,

12
Defendant(s).

13
14
15

ORDER

16

Presently before the court is plaintiff Rebecca Marteney’s ex parte motion for an extension

17

of time. (Doc. # 7). Plaintiff requests an extension to September 12, 2014, in which to serve

18

defendant “Kyle.”

19

The local rules require that “[a]ll ex parte motions, applications, or requests shall contain a

20

statement showing good cause why the matter was submitted to the Court without notice to all

21

parties.” LR 7-5(b). “Motions, applications, or requests may be submitted ex parte only for

22

compelling reasons, and not for unopposed or emergency motions.” LR 7-5(c).

23

Plaintiff has submitted the instant motion ex parte and has failed to include a statement

24

showing good cause why the motion was submitted without notice to all defendants, in violation of

25

the local rules.

26

...

27

...

28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1
2
3
4

Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s motion to extend
time (doc. # 7) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice.
DATED March 17, 2014.

5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-