Ferguson v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER re 16 Stipulated Protective Order. Paragraphs 9 and 10 are NOT APPROVED and DENIED. The parties shall comply with LR 10-5(b) and the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), with respect to filing documents under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/23/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
JOANNA FERGUSON, et al.,
Case No. 2:14-cv-00375-RCJ-PAL
8
Plaintiffs,
9
10
ORDER
v.
DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., et al.
Defendants.
11
12
Before the court is the parties= Stipulated Protective Order and Confidentiality Agreement
13
(Dkt. #16), which the court approved, with the exception of Paragraphs 9 and 10, to facilitate
14
discovery in this case. This order also reminds counsel that there is a presumption of public
15
access to judicial files and records. A party seeking to file a confidential document under seal
16
must file a motion to seal and must comply with the Ninth Circuit=s directives in Kamakana v.
17
City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006).
18
Paragraphs 9 and 10 of the parties’ proposed stipulation was not approved and was
19
deleted by the court.
20
information with the Clerk of the Court in a sealed envelope. While this was an accepted
21
practice prior to the court’s adoption of electronic filing procedures, with a few exceptions not
22
applicable here, the Clerk of the Court no longer maintains paper records. Special Order 109
23
requires the Clerk of the Court to maintain the official files for all cases filed on or after
24
November 7, 2005, in electronic form. The electronic record constitutes the official record of the
25
court. Attorneys must file documents under seal using the court=s electronic filing procedures.
26
See LR 10-5(b). That rule provides:
27
///
28
///
It contained provisions permitting the parties to file confidential
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior Court order,
papers filed with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a
motion for leave to file those documents under seal, and shall be
filed in accordance with the Court=s electronic filing procedures. If
papers are filed under seal pursuant to prior Court order, the papers
shall bear the following notation on the first page, directly under the
case number: AFILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO COURT
ORDER DATED __________.@ All papers filed under seal will
remain sealed until such time as the Court may deny the motion to
seal or enter an order to unseal them, or the documents are unsealed
pursuant to Local Rule.
7
The court has approved the parties= blanket protective order to facilitate their discovery
8
exchanges. However, the parties have not shown, and court has not found, that any specific
9
documents are secret or confidential. The parties have not provided specific facts supported by
10
affidavits or concrete examples to establish that a protective order is required to protect any
11
specific trade secret or other confidential information under Rule 26(c) or that disclosure would
12
cause an identifiable and significant harm. The Ninth Circuit has held that there is a presumption
13
of public access to judicial files and records and that parties seeking to maintain the
14
confidentiality of documents attached to non-dispositive motions must show good cause exists to
15
overcome the presumption of public access. See Kamakana 447 F.3d at 1179. Parties seeking to
16
maintain the secrecy of documents attached to dispositive motions must show compelling
17
reasons sufficient to overcome the presumption of public access. Id. at 1180.
18
Accordingly,
19
IT IS ORDERED:
20
1. Paragraphs 9 and 10 of the Stipulated Protective Order and Confidentiality
21
Agreement (Dkt. #16) are NOT APPROVED and DENIED.
22
2. The parties shall comply with LR 10-5(b) and the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in
23
Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), with respect to filing documents under
24
seal.
25
Dated this 23rd day of July, 2014.
26
27
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?