Bravo Company USA, Inc. v. Badger Ordnance LLC et al
Filing
33
ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Extend Stay of Discovery. Discovery due by 10/15/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
BRAVO COMPANY USA, INC.,
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BADGER ORDNANCE LLC and MARTIN J.
)
BORDSON,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:14-cv-00387-RCJ-GWF
ORDER
Joint Motion to Extend Stay of
Discovery (#32)
13
14
15
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Stay of Discovery
(#32), filed September 15, 2014.
16
The Court permitted limited jurisdictional discovery and further stayed other discovery and
17
pre-trial deadlines until a final determination could be made on personal jurisdiction. See Dkt. #29.
18
The stay was set to automatically lift on or before July 30, 2013, with the parties being permitted to
19
stipulate to extensions of the stay. On July 30, 2014, the parties filed their first joint motion to
20
extend the stay until September 15, 2014, which was granted. See Dkt. #31. Now before the Court
21
is the parties second joint motion, therein requesting to extend the stay until October 15, 2014 to
22
complete jurisdictional discovery. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and LR 26-1, extensions of time
23
may be granted for good cause shown. After reviewing the joint motion, the Court finds the parties
24
have shown good cause. Accordingly,
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
...
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Stay of Discovery
(#32) is granted. The discovery stay shall be extended to October 15, 2014.
DATED this 17th day of September, 2014.
4
5
6
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?