Decovich v. Colvin

Filing 21

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 15 Motion to Remand is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 16 Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/5/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 MI AE DECOVICH, 6 CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-00394-RCJ-CWH Plaintiff, ORDER 7 8 v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, et al., 9 10 Defendants. _______________________________________ 11 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (#191) entered on 12 May 21, 2015, recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal or Remand (ECF #15) 13 and grant Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF #16). 14 Report and Recommendation (ECF #20) was filed on June 4, 2015. Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate’s 15 The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of 16 the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant 17 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s 18 Report and Recommendation (#19) entered on May 21, 2015, should be ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED. 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal or Remand (ECF #15) is 20 21 22 23 24 25 DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF #16) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5TH day of June, 2015. 26 27 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES 28 1 Refers to court’s docket number.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?