Andes Industries, Inc. et al v. Lan et al
Filing
132
ORDER Denying 131 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
ANDES INDUSTRIES, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CHENG SUN LAN, et al.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:14-cv-00400-APG-GWF
ORDER
12
13
14
15
This matter is before the Court on Ruttenberg IP Law’s (“RIPL”) Motion to File Under Seal
(#131), filed on May 9, 2016.
RIPL requests leave to file the exhibits attached to its Motion to Enforce Lien (#130) under
16
seal because its prior clients “do not waive any attorney-client or other privilege” and do not authorize
17
RIPL to waive the privilege. Motion (#131), pg. 1, lns. 8–9. RIPL represents that in light of its prior
18
client’s representations, it “has redacted unnecessary information from the supporting documents
19
(Exhibits 1 through 8).” Id. at lns. 19–20. However, RIPL fails to detail what these documents are
20
and that, as redacted, they contain confidential communications that should not be publicly disclosed.
21
Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ruttenberg IP Law’s Motion to File Under Seal (#131) is
23
denied without prejudice. RIPL is advised that if it decides to re-file its motion it should clarify (1)
24
what information is contained in the documents it seeks to seal, and (2) why its redaction of
25
“unnecessary information” does not obviate the need to seal the exhibits.
26
DATED this 11th day of May, 2016.
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?