Andes Industries, Inc. et al v. Lan et al

Filing 132

ORDER Denying 131 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 ANDES INDUSTRIES, et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CHENG SUN LAN, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:14-cv-00400-APG-GWF ORDER 12 13 14 15 This matter is before the Court on Ruttenberg IP Law’s (“RIPL”) Motion to File Under Seal (#131), filed on May 9, 2016. RIPL requests leave to file the exhibits attached to its Motion to Enforce Lien (#130) under 16 seal because its prior clients “do not waive any attorney-client or other privilege” and do not authorize 17 RIPL to waive the privilege. Motion (#131), pg. 1, lns. 8–9. RIPL represents that in light of its prior 18 client’s representations, it “has redacted unnecessary information from the supporting documents 19 (Exhibits 1 through 8).” Id. at lns. 19–20. However, RIPL fails to detail what these documents are 20 and that, as redacted, they contain confidential communications that should not be publicly disclosed. 21 Accordingly, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ruttenberg IP Law’s Motion to File Under Seal (#131) is 23 denied without prejudice. RIPL is advised that if it decides to re-file its motion it should clarify (1) 24 what information is contained in the documents it seeks to seal, and (2) why its redaction of 25 “unnecessary information” does not obviate the need to seal the exhibits. 26 DATED this 11th day of May, 2016. 27 28 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?