West v. Colvin
Filing
23
ORDER Adopting in Full 21 Report and Recommendation. It Is Further Ordered that 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Remnd is Denied. It Is Further Ordered that 18 Defendant's Cross Motion to Affirm is Granted. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
CHRISTINA WEST,
4
5
6
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
7
8
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:14-cv-0452-GMN-NJK
ORDER
9
10
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
11
Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe, (ECF No. 21), which states that Plaintiff Christina West’s
12
Motion to Remand, (ECF No. 17), should be denied and Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin’s Cross
13
Motion to Affirm, (ECF No. 18), should be granted.
14
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a
15
United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);
16
D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo
17
determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,
18
or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is
20
not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an
21
objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized
22
that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
23
where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
24
1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
25
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.
Page 1 of 2
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 21), is
3
4
5
6
7
8
ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, (ECF No. 17), is
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Cross Motion to Affirm, (ECF No. 18),
is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
DATED this 27th day of July, 2015.
9
10
11
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?