Robello v. Mandalay Corp. et al

Filing 67

ORDER that the clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of defendants Mandalay Corp. and Bartenders Union Local 165 and against plaintiff Debra Robello. Plaintiff Debra Robello's claims against Jesse Estrada were dismissed with prejudice by stipulation of the parties, with neither party to be considered a prevailing party. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 DEBRA ROBELLO, 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT MANDALAY CORP., et al., 8 Case No. 2:14-cv-00456-APG-VCF Defendants. 9 10 On March 14, 2017, I granted summary judgment in favor of defendants Mandalay Bay 11 Corp. and Bartenders Union Local 165. ECF No. 52. I granted in part and denied in part defendant 12 Jesse Estrada’s motion for summary judgment. Id. I granted the motion as to Robello’s assault 13 claim, but denied it as to Robello’s claims for battery and intentional infliction of emotional 14 distress. Id. 15 The parties recently stipulated to the dismissal with prejudice of all of Robello’s claims 16 against Estrada. ECF No. 66. In light of that stipulation, there are no pending claims in this case, 17 so I direct the clerk of court to enter judgment and close this case. 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of 19 defendants Mandalay Corp. and Bartenders Union Local 165 and against plaintiff Debra Robello. 20 Plaintiff Debra Robello’s claims against Jesse Estrada were dismissed with prejudice by stipulation 21 of the parties, with neither party to be considered a prevailing party. The clerk of court is instructed 22 to close this case. 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED this 14th day of August, 2017. ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?