Matthews v. Neven et al

Filing 5

ORDER that the clerk of the court file the petition.Granting 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Federal Public Defender is provisionally appointed to represent petitioner. The Federal Public Defender shall have 30 days to undertake dire ct representation of petitioner or to indicate to the court his inability to represent petitioner. If the Federal Public Defender does undertake representation of petitioner, he shall then have 60 days to file an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus.Respondents counsel shall enter a notice of appearance within 20 days. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/29/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: AG, FPD - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 6 7 JEMAR D. MATTHEWS, 8 Petitioner, 9 10 11 vs. Case No. 2:14-cv-00472-GMN-PAL ORDER DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., Respondents. 12 13 Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Currently before the court are the petition for a writ of 14 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel. 15 Petitioner is unable to afford counsel, and the issues presented warrant the appointment of counsel. 16 See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). The court will provisionally appoint the Federal Public Defender, 17 but the court notes that there might be a conflict of interest. It appears that petitioner’s co-defendant 18 was Pierre Donte Joshlin, whom the Federal Public Defender represents in Joshlin v. Neven, No. 19 2:13-cv-01014-JAD-NJK. 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court file the petition. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (#2) is 22 23 GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender is provisionally appointed to represent petitioner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender shall have thirty (30) days 24 from the date that this order is entered to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to indicate 25 to the court his inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. If the Federal Public Defender 26 does undertake representation of petitioner, he shall then have sixty (60) days to file an amended 27 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. If the Federal Public Defender is unable to represent petitioner, 28 then the court shall appoint alternate counsel. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that neither the foregoing deadline nor any extension thereof 2 signifies or will signify any implied finding of a basis for tolling during the time period established. 3 Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation period 4 and timely asserting claims. 5 6 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve both the Attorney 8 General of the State of Nevada and the Federal Public Defender a copy of the petition and a copy of 9 this order. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ counsel shall enter a notice of appearance 11 within twenty (20) days of entry of this order, but no further response shall be required from 12 respondents until further order of the court. 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any exhibits filed by the parties shall be filed with a 14 separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The CM/ECF attachments 15 that are filed further shall be identified by the number or numbers (or letter or letters) of the exhibits 16 in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall be 17 forwarded—for this case—to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. 18 DATED this 29th day of August, 2014. 19 20 _________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?