Exobox Technologies Corp. v. Tsambis
Filing
143
ORDER that the Clerk will remove the ex parte status from 132 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and Amended Complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that 132 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
5
EXOBOX TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
Plaintiff,
6
7
vs.
8
2:14-cv-00501-RFB-VCF
ORDER
ZACHARY TSAMBIS, et al.,
Defendants.
9
10
Before the court is Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and
11
12
Amended Complaint. (#132).
13
Exobox seeks to extend the time to effect service of the Summonses and Amended Complaint
14
upon those Defendants that have not been served. Id. Plaintiff has given sufficient reason to grant the
15
extension of time to serve the summonses and amended complaint.
16
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-5(c), [m]otions, applications or requests may be submitted ex parte only
17
for compelling reasons, and not for unopposed or emergency motions. In the declaration of Zachary
18
Takos, Exobox states that the instant motion is ex parte "because the relief sought does not impact or
19
affect any of the Defendants who have been served in this matter." This is not a compelling reason to file
20
the instant motion ex parte. This motion will not be deemed ex parte.
21
Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk will remove the ex parte status from the Motion for
23
Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and Amended Complaint (#132).
24
…
25
…
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and
2
Amended Complaint (#132) is GRANTED.
3
DATED this 9th day of April, 2015.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?