Patton v. Cortez Masto et al

Filing 14

ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall electronically serve a copy of this Order and a copy of Plaintiff's 8 Complaint on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada. Within 21 days of the date of entry of this Order the At torney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and Plaintiff re the names of the Defendants for whom it accepts or does not accept service for. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 KENNETH PATTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JAMES COX et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________ ) 2:14-cv-519-LDG-PAL ORDER 13 This is an action on a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, removed from 14 state court. The Court entered a screening order on May 15, 2014. (ECF No. 7). The 15 screening order imposed a 90-day stay and the Court entered a subsequent order in which the 16 parties were assigned to mediation by a court-appointed mediator. (ECF No. 7, 11). The 17 Office of the Attorney General has filed a status report indicating that settlement has not been 18 reached and informing the Court of its intent to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 12). 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 20 1. The Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order and a copy 21 of Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 8) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of 22 Nevada, attention Kat Howe. 23 2. Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 7), within twenty-one 24 (21) days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General’s Office shall file a notice 25 advising the Court and Plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it accepts 26 service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the 27 names of the defendants for whom it is filing last-known-address information under seal. As 28 to any of the named defendants for which the Attorney General’s Office cannot accept service, 1 the Office shall file, under seal, the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom 2 it has such information. 3 3. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), Plaintiff shall 4 file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and 5 specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to which the 6 Attorney General has not provided last-known-address information, Plaintiff shall provide the 7 full name and address for the defendant(s). 8 9 10 11 4. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. 5. Henceforth, Plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been 12 entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document 13 submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper 14 submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document 15 was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a notice 16 of appearance, Plaintiff shall direct service to the individual attorney named in the notice of 17 appearance, at the address stated therein. The Court may disregard any paper received by 18 a district judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk of the Court, and 19 any paper received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk of the Court which fails 20 to include a certificate showing proper service. 21 22 DATED: This 21st day of August, 2014. 23 24 _________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?