Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Health and Welfare Trust and Plan et al v. Expert Services, Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER Granting in part 18 Motion to Dismiss. Denying as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss and 9 Motion to Extend Time. Motions due within 30 days. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/7/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS
AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 525 HEALTH
AND WELFARE TRUST AND PLAN, et al.,
9
Plaintiff(s),
10
11
Case No. 2:14-CV-552 JCM (CWH)
ORDER
v.
EXPERT SERVICES, INC., et al,
12
Defendant(s).
13
14
15
Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for
summary judgment. (Doc. # 7). Plaintiffs have responded (doc. # 8) and defendants have
16
replied (doc. # 11).
17
Also before the court is plaintiffs’ counter motion to extend time.
18
19
Defendants have responded (doc. # 12) and plaintiffs have replied (doc. # 13).
20
21
(Doc. # 9).
Finally before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for voluntary dismissal.
(Doc. # 18).
Defendants have responded (doc. # 20) and plaintiffs have replied (doc. #21).
22
I.
Background
23
24
Plaintiffs are trustees of trust funds entitled to receive remittance payments from certain
25
employers on behalf of employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Plaintiffs
26
allege they are beneficiaries for the purposes of ERISA. Defendants are corporations that agreed
27
28
to acquire certain intangible assets previously owned by a covered employer, non-party Lloyd’s
1
Refrigeration, Inc. (“Lloyd’s”).
2
3
Plaintiffs have filed the instant complaint seeking to recover allegedly unpaid
contributions from these defendants that were owed by Lloyd’s. Defendants filed the instant
4
5
motion to dismiss, or alternatively for summary judgment, asserting that they are not the alter
6
egos or successors to Lloyd’s and therefore cannot be held liable to the trust funds for the unpaid
7
contributions. In response, plaintiffs have filed the instant motion seeking to voluntarily dismiss
8
their claims without prejudice with each side bearing its own costs and fees. Defendants agree to
9
dismissal without prejudice, however, seek leave to move for attorneys’ fees.
10
11
II.
Legal Standard
12
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), a plaintiff may request dismissal of an action after the
13
filing of an answer or motion for summary judgment by order of the court. The court has the
14
discretion to dismiss a matter subject to any terms and conditions that it considers proper.
15
Westlands Water Dist. v. United States, 100 F.3d 94, 96 (9th Cir. 1996).
16
17
III.
Discussion
18
During informal discovery, defendants produced a document that suggested the plaintiffs’
19
claims against defendants were without merit. As a result plaintiffs decided to voluntarily
20
dismiss their complaint.
21
Plaintiffs assert that their swift attempt to resolve this dispute early on should be
22
23
encouraged. They contend that their voluntary dismissal promotes judicial efficiency and saves
24
both parties additional fees and that any other order would discourage parties from conducting
25
informal discovery and attempting to quickly resolve disputes on their own.
26
27
The court is not entirely persuaded. A better policy to prevent the court and parties from
wasting time and resources would be to encourage plaintiffs to thoroughly research and ensure
28
-2-
1
the merit of claims before filing.
2
researching, preparing, and filing a response and motion to the plaintiffs’ claims, which appear to
3
Here, the defendants incurred substantial expense from
be without merit. While the imposition of costs and fees is not mandatory, the defendants’
4
5
6
interests can be protected by conditioning the dismissal without prejudice upon the payment of
appropriate costs and attorneys’ fees. Westlands, 100 F.3d at 97.
7
The court concludes that it is proper to afford defendants an opportunity to move for
8
appropriate fees. Defendants shall file their request in compliance with the applicable federal
9
and local rules governing attorneys’ fees within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this order.
10
11
Accordingly,
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED plaintiffs’ motion for
13
voluntary dismissal (doc. # 18) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED IN PART consistent with
14
the foregoing.
15
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for
16
17
18
19
20
21
summary judgment (doc. # 7) and plaintiffs’ counter motion to extend time (doc. # 9) are hereby
DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall file their motion for attorneys’ fees
within 30 days of the issuance of this order.
DATED August 7, 2014.
22
23
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?