Harden v. Soboro et al
Filing
75
ORDER that 72 Motion for copy of docket is DENIED as moot, as the Court has already provided a copy of the docket. Accordingly, to the extent Plaintiff seeks anything beyond what was provided previously, his motion is hereby DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/2/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
HAROLD D. HARDEN,
9
10
11
12
13
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SOBORO, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
2:14-cv-00560-JAD-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 72)
14
On October 27, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for a copy of the docket, instructing
15
the Clerk’s Office to send a copy of the docket to Plaintiff. Docket No. 49. Now pending before the
16
Court is a motion for “a full docket history copy.” See Docket No. 72. As the Court has already
17
provided a copy of the docket, the pending motion is DENIED as moot. To the extent Plaintiff seeks
18
an updated copy of the docket or a copy of any filed documents, he has failed to show a specific need
19
for them or that he cannot afford to obtain them himself. See Docket No. 49 at 1-2 (addressing relevant
20
standard and case law). Accordingly, to the extent Plaintiff seeks anything beyond what was provided
21
previously, his motion is hereby DENIED.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
DATED: March 2, 2015
24
25
26
NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?