Harden v. Soboro et al

Filing 75

ORDER that 72 Motion for copy of docket is DENIED as moot, as the Court has already provided a copy of the docket. Accordingly, to the extent Plaintiff seeks anything beyond what was provided previously, his motion is hereby DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/2/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 HAROLD D. HARDEN, 9 10 11 12 13 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SOBORO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 2:14-cv-00560-JAD-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 72) 14 On October 27, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for a copy of the docket, instructing 15 the Clerk’s Office to send a copy of the docket to Plaintiff. Docket No. 49. Now pending before the 16 Court is a motion for “a full docket history copy.” See Docket No. 72. As the Court has already 17 provided a copy of the docket, the pending motion is DENIED as moot. To the extent Plaintiff seeks 18 an updated copy of the docket or a copy of any filed documents, he has failed to show a specific need 19 for them or that he cannot afford to obtain them himself. See Docket No. 49 at 1-2 (addressing relevant 20 standard and case law). Accordingly, to the extent Plaintiff seeks anything beyond what was provided 21 previously, his motion is hereby DENIED. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: March 2, 2015 24 25 26 NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?