Harden v. Soboro et al

Filing 85

ORDER Denying 77 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider Magistrate Judge Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 HAROLD D. HARDEN, 9 10 11 12 13 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SOBORO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 2:14-cv-00560-JAD-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 77) 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the undersigned to reconsider her order 15 extending the time to file dispositive motions. See Docket No. 77; see also Docket No. 76 (order 16 extending the time to file dispositive motions). Defendants filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 17 79.1 No reply was filed. The Court finds the motion properly resolved without oral argument. See Local 18 Rule 78-2. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is hereby DENIED. 19 Motions for reconsideration are disfavored. E.g., Kabo Tools Co. v. Porauto Indus. Co., 2013 20 WL 5947138, *2 (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2013) (citing Japan Cash Mach. Co. v. Mei, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. 21 Lexis 98778, *7 (D. Nev. Nov. 20, 2008)). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is 22 presented with newly discovered evidence; (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was 23 manifestly unjust; or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Kabo Tools, 2013 WL 24 5947138, at *2 (quoting Frasure v. United States, 256 F. Supp. 2d 1180, 1183 (D. Nev. 2004)). Having 25 1 26 Defendants acknowledge that their response was untimely. Docket No. 29 at 2 n.1. The Court will consider the opposition in this case, but reminds counsel that the Court expects strict compliance with the Local Rules in the future. 1 reviewed Plaintiff’s pending motion, the Court finds that none of those circumstances exist such that the 2 Court’s prior order should be changed. 3 Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is hereby DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: May 4, 2015 6 7 8 NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?