Krohn v. Equity Title, LLC et al

Filing 24

ORDER Granting 23 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The Parties shall have fourteen (14) days from decision of the pending motion to dismiss to submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order which complies with LR 26-1(e) as to any claims which survive. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

SHELLEY D. KROHN, Chapter 7 Trustee,

8
9
10

Case No. 2:14-00620-MMD-PAL
cv-00620-MMD-PAL

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
EQUITY TITLE, et al.,
Defendants.

11
12
13

Before the court is the Parties Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order which

14

requests special scheduling review (Dkt. #23).

The Parties proposed discovery plan and

15

scheduling order requests that the court not require discovery to commence until after a ruling on

16

a pending motion to dismiss. Both sides agree that it would be a potential waste of time and

17

resources to being discovery before a decision on the motion to dismiss because if the motion is

18

granted it will likely be dispositive of the entire

19

Having reviewed and considered the matter,

20

IT IS ORDERED

21

1.

The Parties request for special scheduling review is GRANTED.

22

2.

The Parties shall have fourteen (14) days from decision of the pending motion to

23

dismiss to submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order which complies with LR 26-

24

1(e) as to any claims which survive.

25

Dated this 18th day of July, 2014.

26
27
28

__________________________________________
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE