Johnson v. Department of the Air Force, et al

Filing 57

ORDER re 56 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Tanya E. Johnson. Any response shall be filed no later than October 13, 2017. The Court hereby SETS a hearing on the motion for October 23, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3B.Plaintiff Tanya E. Johnson, her current counsel of record, and any newly retained counsel shall attend the hearing. THERE WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS TO THESE APPEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. The failure to attend the hearing may result in the imposition of sanctions.No later than October 5, 2017, Plaintiff's current counsel of record shall serve Plaintiff with this order and shall file a proof of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 TANYA E. JOHNSON, 8 Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:14-cv-00631-RFB-NJK ORDER RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW (Docket No. 56) 13 Pending before the Court is the motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Tanya E. Johnson. 14 Docket No. 56. Any response shall be filed no later than October 13, 2017. The Court hereby SETS 15 a hearing on the motion for October 23, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3B. Plaintiff Tanya E. 16 Johnson, her current counsel of record, and any newly retained counsel shall attend the hearing. THERE 17 WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS TO THESE APPEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. The failure to attend 18 the hearing may result in the imposition of sanctions. 19 No later than October 5, 2017, Plaintiff’s current counsel of record shall serve Plaintiff with this 20 order and shall file a proof of service. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: October 3, 2017. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?