Grant v. General Motors, LLC

Filing 45

ORDER denying without prejudice 41 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
MIA GRANT,

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:14-cv-00648-RFB-CWH
ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery (doc. # 41), filed
January 12, 2015.

15

After careful review, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion to compel must be denied for

16

failure to comply with Local Rule 26-7(a). Local Rule 26-7(a) requires a discovery motion to “set

17

forth in full the text of the discovery originally sought and the response thereto, if any.” Loc.Civ.R.

18

26-7(a). However, Defendant fails to provide the complete text of requests, along with Plaintiff’s

19

specific discovery responses, in the body of the motion. Defendant also does not bother to link its

20

arguments to the complete text of requests and to Plaintiff’s specific discovery responses. Instead,

21

Defendant has simply attached its requests and Plaintiff’s prior discovery responses as exhibits, which

22

fails to comply with the rules.

23
24
25

Based on the forgoing and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery (doc. # 41) is denied without prejudice.
DATED: January 13, 2015

26
27
28

______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge