Jiles v. Williams et al
Filing
8
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 7 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
MAURICE JILES,
10
Case No. 2:14-cv-00712-MMD-NJK
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
11
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
The Court screened the proposed complaint and dismissed this case with
16
prejudice on June 12, 2014. (Dkt. no. 3.) Plaintiff has moved to reopen the case based
17
on his claim that he was not served with the screening order and was not aware that the
18
case was dismissed. (Dkt. no. 7.) The Court's records show that a copy of the screening
19
order was sent to Plaintiff at the mailing address reflected on the Court's docket. (Dkt.
20
no. 3.) While it is unfortunate that Plaintiff did not timely receive a copy, that fact alone
21
is not a valid reason for the Court to reopen a case dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's
22
motion to reopen case (dkt. no. 7) is denied.
23
DATED THIS 18th day of December 2015.
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M DU
MIRANDA M.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?